Environment
6:08 pm
Wed July 18, 2012

Can Adding Iron To Oceans Slow Global Warming?

Originally published on Wed July 18, 2012 7:30 pm

A noted oceanographer once quipped that if you gave him a tanker half-filled with iron, he could give you an ice age. He was only half-joking.

Adding iron to the ocean can cause blooms of algae, which have the potential to take huge amounts of carbon dioxide out of the air and by so doing, cool the planet. And a report in Nature magazine now offers some support for that idea.

The premise of this experiment is that algae growing in the oceans around Antarctica can't grow fast because it's starved of an essential nutrient: iron. Victor Smetacek at the Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research in Bremerhaven, Germany, says iron in the ocean is as precious as water is for plants on the land.

"Where you have heavy rainfall you have forests, and where you have no rainfall you have deserts," he says. "And you have the same thing with iron falling from the atmosphere on the oceans."

Thirty years ago, scientists started wondering whether they could create huge blooms of algae in the oceans by adding iron. In concept, the algae would also soak up huge amounts of carbon — carbon that's in the air and in the ocean as a result of our burning fossil fuels. Sending carbon to the sea floor could slow global warming. So Smetacek and his colleagues went to sea in 2004 to make algae blooms by adding iron to the water.

"Previous experiments showed if you added the iron you'd get a big algal bloom. But they were not able to show what happened to the bloom," he says.

Experiments In The Ocean

So on his expedition, the scientists found a place in the southern ocean where swirling currents created a natural container for their experiment. Their research vessel sprinkled iron into the water and stayed there for four weeks to measure what has happening to the algae that they had fertilized.

Within a few weeks, the algae died and clumped up like snowflakes. Those particles fell down into the deep, "and we were able to track the particles sinking out of the surface layer all the way down to the sediments."

In fact, they fell rapidly through more than two miles of ocean water.

"By the time we left more than half the bloom had sunk out to the deep," Smetacek says, "and we are confident that the remaining half also sunk out, but after we had left."

Figuring out what happened took many years of analysis and calculation. But now, eight years after their experiment, the team has published its results.

They showed that adding iron really can transport substantial amounts of carbon from the surface down to the seafloor. In fact, it did so surprisingly quickly and efficiently — and apparently without harming the ecosystem.

Concerns Over Sinking Carbon

That's an intriguing finding for people who have been eyeing iron fertilization of the oceans as a way to slow global warming. But Smetacek doesn't leap to any conclusions.

"We need to carry out many more experiments before we embark on anything like that — before we even talk about anything like that," he says.

And those experiments pretty much ground to a halt a few years ago. A couple of companies swooped into this field, hoping to make money by sinking carbon and selling carbon credits. And critics started raising concerns.

"At best, this technology appears to be speculative in terms of its ability to permanently sequester carbon," says Lisa Speer at the Natural Resources Defense Council. "And at worst, it could turn out to be a disastrous experiment that could have major impacts on the ocean ecosystems that billions of people rely on for food and for employment and for life itself."

Speer says it's usually very hard to track what happens to carbon in the ocean. Adding iron can potentially trigger toxic algae blooms. There's even some research suggesting that fertilizing the ocean with iron can end up producing nitrous oxide, which is a potent greenhouse gas.

And she worries that the appeal of what seems to be an easy fix would distract people from doing all the hard work involved in reducing carbon dioxide emissions to begin with.

For the moment, that doesn't seem to be an issue — the two companies hoping to capitalize on this have folded.

Ken Buesseler at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution argues it's important to keep doing this kind of work, despite the understandable doubts about trying to engineer algae blooms on a grand scale to deal with global warming. He says these experiments can help explain what's going to happen to the ocean's natural ability to take carbon dioxide out of the air.

One-third of the carbon dioxide that we put into the air by burning fossil fuels ends up in the ocean. "Will that number increase or decrease as we create a warmer ocean and a more acidic ocean?" Buesseler asks. "This type of experiment helps us understand that."

New international rules are now set to allow experiments like this to go forward, but research funding is scarce.

Copyright 2012 National Public Radio. To see more, visit http://www.npr.org/.

Transcript

AUDIE CORNISH, HOST:

It's ALL THINGS CONSIDERED from NPR News. I'm Audie Cornish.

ROBERT SIEGEL, HOST:

And I'm Robert Siegel. A noted oceanographer once quipped, give me a half tanker of iron and I will give you an ice age. He was only half joking. Adding iron to the ocean can cause blooms of algae. They have the potential to take huge amounts of carbon dioxide out of the air and, by so doing, cool the planet. Well, that's the theory, at least.

NPR's Richard Harris reports on the long-awaited results of a study that tried it out.

RICHARD HARRIS, BYLINE: The premise of this experiment is that algae growing in the oceans around Antarctica can't grow fast because it's starved of an essential nutrient - iron. Victor Smetacek at the Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research in Germany says iron there is as precious as water is for plants on the land.

VICTOR SMETACEK: Where you have heavy rainfall, you have forests and where there is no rainfall, you have deserts. And you have the same thing with iron falling from the atmosphere on the ocean.

HARRIS: Thirty years ago, scientists started wondering if they could create huge blooms of algae in the oceans by adding iron. In concept, the algae would also soak up huge amounts of carbon, carbon that's in the air and in the ocean as a result of our burning fossil fuels. Sending carbon to the sea floor could slow global warming.

So, Smetacek and his colleagues went to sea in 2004 to make algae blooms by adding iron to the water.

SMETACEK: Previous experiments showed was that you added the iron. you got a big algae bloom, but they were not able to show what happened to the bloom.

HARRIS: So, on his expedition, the scientists found a place in the southern ocean where swirling currents created a natural container for their experiment. Their research vessel sprinkled iron into the water and stayed there for four weeks to measure what was happening to the algae that they had fertilized.

Within a few weeks, the algae died and clumped up like snowflakes. Those particles fell down into the deep.

SMETACEK: And we were able to track the particles sinking out of the surface layer all the way down to the sediments.

HARRIS: Down, down through more than two miles of ocean water.

SMETACEK: By the time we left, more than half the bloom had sunk out to the deep and we are confident that the remaining half also sank out, but after we had left.

HARRIS: These results reported in Nature magazine showed that adding iron really can transport substantial amounts of carbon from the surface down to the sea floor. In fact, it did so surprisingly quickly and efficiently and apparently without harming the ecosystem. That's an intriguing finding for people who have been eyeing iron fertilization for the oceans as a way to slow global warming, but Smetacek says, not so fast.

SMETACEK: We need to carry out many more experiments before we should embark on anything like that, before we even talk about anything like that.

HARRIS: And those experiments pretty much ground to a halt a few years ago. A couple of companies swooped into this field hoping to make money by sinking carbon and selling carbon credits and critics started raising concerns.

Lisa Speer at the Natural Resources Defense Council says, what if the process disrupts ecosystems in the ocean? What if it turns out that carbon doesn't stay in the deep?

LISA SPEER: At best, this technology appears to be speculative in terms of its ability to permanently sequester carbon. And, at worst, it could turn out to be a disastrous experiment that could have major impacts on the ocean ecosystems that billions of people rely on for food and for employment and for life itself.

HARRIS: Speer worries that the appeal of what seems to be an easy fix would distract people from doing all the hard work involved in reducing carbon dioxide emissions to begin with. For the moment, that doesn't seem to be an issue. The two companies hoping to capitalize on this have folded.

Ken Buesseler at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution argues it's important to keep doing this kind of work, even if you are skeptical about doing it on a grand scale, to deal with global warming. He says these experiments can help explain what's going to happen to the ocean's natural ability to take carbon dioxide out of the air.

KEN BUESSELER: A third of our greenhouse gases we release in the atmosphere, the CO2 ends up in the ocean and will that number increase or decrease as we create a warmer ocean, a more acidic ocean? This type of experiment helps us understand that.

HARRIS: New international rules are now set to allow experiments like this to go forward, but research funding is scarce.

Richard Harris, NPR News. Transcript provided by NPR, Copyright National Public Radio.